{"id":208581,"date":"2023-04-10T09:31:19","date_gmt":"2023-04-10T13:31:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/interiordesign.net\/?post_type=id_research&p=208581"},"modified":"2023-04-11T16:10:55","modified_gmt":"2023-04-11T20:10:55","slug":"interior-design-top-100-giants-2023","status":"publish","type":"id_research","link":"https:\/\/interiordesign.net\/research\/interior-design-top-100-giants-2023\/","title":{"rendered":"Interior Design Unveils the 2023 Top 100 Giants"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\"an
Fogarty Finger designed the Anagram Nomad apartments in New York. Photography by David Mitchell.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n

April 10, 2023<\/p>\n\n\n

Words: <\/span>Mike Zimmerman<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Interior Design Unveils the 2023 Top 100 Giants<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s easy to get hung up on symbolic numbers. Like, say, $5 billion. Nice and round. What could it represent, besides a comfortable retirement? In our case, a growth threshold for the Interior Design<\/em> 100 Giants. In 2022, fees for the biggest firms came in just shy of that, at $4.97 billion\u2014pretty good when you consider the turmoil of the past few years. That figure also marks 12 percent growth over 2021, beating the group\u2019s forecast by 16 percent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Top 100 Giants 2023<\/h3>\n
\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> 2023 Rank<\/th> Firm<\/th> HQ Location<\/th> Design Fees (in millions)<\/th> FFC Value (in millions)<\/th> Sq. Ft. (in millions)<\/th> Design Staff<\/th> 2022 Rank<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n Gensler<\/a><\/td>\n San Francisco<\/td>\n 625.70<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n -<\/td>\n 3,599<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n Jacobs<\/a><\/td>\n Dallas<\/td>\n 324.40<\/td>\n 8,110<\/td>\n 4.6<\/td>\n 1,267<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n Perkins&Will<\/a><\/td>\n Chicago<\/td>\n 221.00<\/td>\n 6,820<\/td>\n -<\/td>\n 700<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n AECOM<\/a><\/td>\n Dallas<\/td>\n 217.60<\/td>\n 9,793<\/td>\n -<\/td>\n 472<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n HOK<\/a><\/td>\n St. Louis<\/td>\n 157.40<\/td>\n 5,154<\/td>\n 58.1<\/td>\n 1,195<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n IA Interior Architects<\/a><\/td>\n San Francisco<\/td>\n 154.20<\/td>\n 3,351<\/td>\n 51.6<\/td>\n 543<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n CannonDesign<\/a><\/td>\n New York City<\/td>\n 125.00<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n -<\/td>\n 520<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n Page Southerland Page<\/a><\/td>\n Washington<\/td>\n 124.90<\/td>\n 2,297<\/td>\n 8.3<\/td>\n 120<\/td>\n 29<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n Stantec<\/a><\/td>\n Edmonton, Canada<\/td>\n 122.30<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n -<\/td>\n 667<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n SmithGroup<\/a><\/td>\n Detroit<\/td>\n 121.00<\/td>\n 0<\/td>\n -<\/td>\n 216<\/td>\n 13<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>